Application, advantages and disadvantages of fog harvesting
Main applications:
- fog collectors can provide water meeting World Health Organization drinking water standards to rural communities and groups of homes; this water is inexpensive to produce and can be delivered to the homes by gravity flow
- fog collectors can provide water for reforestation of ridge lines and the upper parts of mountains where it is impractical to import water from conventional sources; the fog water can be delivered to drip irrigation systems by gravity flow and the resulting forests, if properly situated, can become self-sustaining by directly collecting fog water. (Schemenauer 2008)
Advantages:
- Passive collection system requiring no energy input to operate
- Cheap and easy to maintain and repair
- Water quality is generally good in non-industrial areas, though pH can often be low
- Modular system that can grow in line with demand or available funds
- Quick and simple design and construction. Installation requires little time or skill
- Low capital investment and other costs compared to conventional sources of potable water in mountainous and arid areas
Disadvantages:
- Technology requires very specific climatologic and topographic conditions. Yield is difficult to predict so a thorough pilot project is required in every case
- Yield is very sensitive to changes in climate conditions and so a back-up supply is required
- Fog collection is unlikely to be of regional or national importance as a water supply. Emphasis is on the local level which requires full community participation
- If the collectors are not close to the point of use then the cost of the pipeline can make the system uneconomic and hydraulically difficult
- Vulnerability to vandalism
- Good access to the site is required for installation, maintenance and monitoring
(Furey 1998)